As there are so many similarities between Northumberland and Durham’s proposed plans we decided to pass on this information for your viewing.
A brief summary follows on the INSPECTOR’S INTERIM VIEWS on the legal compliance and soundness of the submitted County Durham plan
To view the full report click here Durham Report
Released on Wednesday 18th February – this Inspectors interim report indicates that Durham County Council (DCC) Local Plan is unsound. DCC now has three options.
a) To continue the examination
b) To suspend it or
c) To withdraw the plan.
The Inspector has advised that it would not be in the best interests of plan making to recommend an unsound plan.
There are so many similarities between Northumberland and Durham’s proposed Plans; the findings are key to Ponteland residents and evidence that our concerns are justified!
Ponteland Green Belt Group has asked NCC for their initial response to this key DCC document due to the similarities of NCC Draft Core Strategy – we await their reply.
- Population and economic growth scenarios provided from Edge Analytics across both Plan areas.
- Assessment of housing needs is too high…. the Council’s vision incorporates unrealistic assumptions about jobs growth and associated in-migration.
- Following each stage of DCC Consultation following comments made by residents many changes were made to the Plan relating to both sites and policies – unlike NCC who have ignored residents’ concerns.
- Unnecessary dwellings proposed for the Green Belt and a full review of non-Green Belt sources of supply should be undertaken.
- Proposed relief roads are not justified.
- The jobs target is very ambitious.
- The employment statistics are an unacceptable risk and the housing potential is an overprovision.
- No allowance has been made for bringing empty houses back into use, there is no allowance for small windfall sites and many brownfield areas of land have not been assessed.
- The housing requirement should be reduced (suggests 29%)
- Incursions into the Green Belt are directly contrary to national policy.
- There is no need to release 3 large sites from the Green Belt.
- Development of some sites would contribute to urban sprawl.
- There are no exceptional circumstance which would justify release of 72.4 hectares of Green Belt land in Chester le Street.